|
|
eaDonNTU, Donetsk >
Научные труды ДонНТУ >
Серия: Экономическая >
Випуск 3(45) >
Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://ea.donntu.ru/handle/123456789/27056
|
| Название: | Динамическое взаимодействие институтов в системе факторов реформирования экономики |
| Другие названия: | Динамічна взаємодія інститутів в системі факторів реформування економіки
DYNAMIC INTERACTION OF INSTITUTES IN THE SYSTEM OF ECONOMY REFORMING FACTORS |
| Авторы: | Решетило, В.П.
Пыж, Н.С.
Решетило, В.П.
Пиж, Н.С.
RESHETILO, V.P.
PYZH, N.S. |
| Ключевые слова: | институты
системный анализ
институциональная система
целостность
иерархичность
эмерджентность
гибкость
адаптивность
многофункциональность
робастность институциональных систем
динамический анализ
эволюция
динамическое взаимодействие
інститути
системний аналіз
інституційна система
цілісність
ієрархічність
емерджентність
гнучкість
адаптивність
багатофункціональність
робастність інституційних систем
динамічний аналіз
еволюція
динамічна взаємодія
institutions
systems analysis
institutional system
integrity
hierarchy
emergence
flexibility
adaptability
versatility
robustness of institutional systems
dynamic analysis
the evolution
the dynamic interaction |
| Дата публикации: | 2013 |
| Издатель: | ДонНТУ |
| Библиографическое описание: | Наукові праці Донецького національного технічного університету. Серія: економічна. Випуск 3(45) - Донецьк, ДонНТУ, 2013. |
| Аннотация: | Проведен анализ функционального назначения, структуры, места и роли институциональной системы в трансформирующемся обществе, показана зависимость характера институциональных систем от уровня развития материально-технической базы общества и накопленной в экономике страны сложности, выявлен нелинейный характер взаимодействия институциональной системы с экономической, политической и социальной системами, исследованы ключевые проблемы становления эффективной институциональной системы в Украине и ее роль в повышении качества реформирования экономики. |
| Описание: | The paper analyses the functional purpose, structure, place and role of the institutional system in a transforming society, shows dependence of the institutional framework nature on the level of the material base development in the society and difficulties accumulated in the country's economy, identifies nonlinear interaction of the institutional system with economic, political and social systems, examines the key challenges of becoming an effective institutional system in Ukraine and its role in improving the quality of economic reform. There are analyzed such system-wide properties of the institutional system, as integrity, hierarchy, emergence, flexibility, adaptability, versatility, robustness; there are defined the specific features and difficulties in carrying out a dynamic analysis of the institutional system as a stochastic system, being under the influence of a number of random factors, the development of which can not be accurately forecast in detail for a long term (this applies especially to informal institutions such as psychology, culture, mentality and traditions of the country.) Modern institutional systems are a new type of complexity, growing according to nonlinear laws related to the complete fusion of subject and object changes. The framework of the dilemma "subjective - objective" in the institutional systems is expanding: the institutional structure is formed in the process of spontaneous emergence of institutions, and in the course of conscious institutional building, anchored by the legislation. A complex web of spontaneous and conscious of institutional change is determined by the fact that at the micro level the people's actions are intentional in nature (determined by considerations of utility), and at the macro level - they are nonlinear, i.e. depend on the results of the collective interaction of many macro subjects. Therefore, when analyzing the institutional framework it is necessary to consider that, on the one hand, they are subject to the dynamics of the general principles of the formation and development of complex systems, and on the other hand, they are formed with the participation of intelligence, able to select the development options and to some extent guide it. It is proved that at the industrial
stage of the society development, the institutional system acts as a subsystem to the economic system, and it feels its determining influence. By virtue of such a hierarchy, institutional system operates not only on its own program (behavior patterns), but also with the response to the current one, unknown in advance change in the economic supersystem (the act of behavior). This implies that the choice of a particular type of institutional system is not completely free, it depends on the complexity accumulated in the economy of the country, and that is, fractality of economic structure has a decisive influence on the structure of the institutional system. The study of coherent institutional systems rather than individual institutions, their relationships and interactions in economic, social and political systems of the society leads to a deeper understanding of their national identity and the presence of a certain ratio of general and special, which is the basis of identity of the nation, its understanding of itself themselves, their institutional strengths and weaknesses. Thus, the roots of the emerging fundamental differences between formal and real processes in the transformation economy are to be found in the institutional system of the command economy. Institutional reforms in Ukraine today require fulfilling several conditions: the inviolability of private property rights, contract enforcement and the inevitability of punishment for violation of the law. The current stage of systemic transformations in Ukraine requires a fundamentally new state policy aimed at conscious control over the processes of institutional change, including internal selfsystem status and the correct choice of the resonance zones, on which the government's influence should be focused. In this case, it is high time to transfer from the model of "political modernization" of the institutional environment, involving the active offer of the institutes of the state, to a model of "market modernization" that is driven by demand for institutions on the part of market participants. The model of market modernization of institutions suggests that institutional reforms should precede constitutionally approved procedure of studying the demand for these reforms by all actors in the national market. |
| URI: | http://ea.donntu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/27056 |
| Располагается в коллекциях: | Випуск 3(45)
|
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.
|
