|
eaDonNTU, Donetsk >
Научные труды ДонНТУ >
Серия: Экономическая >
Випуск 2(44) >
Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://ea.donntu.ru/handle/123456789/27990
|
| Название: | Інституціональні проблеми розвитку та відродження зростання національної економіки |
| Другие названия: | Институциональные проблемы развития и возрождения роста национальной экономики
Institutional problems of development and growth of the national economy |
| Авторы: | Березянко, Т.В.
Berezianko, T.V. |
| Ключевые слова: | інституціоналізм
управлінська система
економічне зростання
олігополія
institutionalism
government
corporate sector
oligopoly
system of market regulation
институционализм
управленческая система
экономический рост
олигополия |
| Дата публикации: | 2013 |
| Издатель: | ДонНТУ |
| Библиографическое описание: | Наукові праці Донецького національного технічного університету. Серія: економічна. Випуск 2(44) - Донецьк, ДонНТУ, 2013. |
| Аннотация: | Розглянута проблема впливу на розвиток національного суспільства інституціональної недосконалості. Визначено чинники формування інституціональної пастки та можливі інструменти її подолання. Розглянуто зв’язок між інтересами власника, компанії, суспільства та державного управління. |
| Описание: | The problems of connection of development and growth of the economy and the market society with the level of excellence of the institutional component of its organization are studied. The problem of achieving coherence in the activities of corporate business, government and society as a whole system is put forward. Namely the presence of conflicts of interest in the trigram is called the main obstacle to the development, and the hypertrophied priority of private problems is an artificial barrier to the transition to the next stage of market evolution. The task of government in the said situation is to overcome the passivity and transfer to the role of an active facilitator. Almost every transformational theory of market development has been designed to achieve and maintain a priority on technical and technological principle, the method of access to finance, and later - use information vacuum. The first results of the market transformation have created the theory of "the effect of greed," "contract culture" etc. And only receiving the results of the analysis of the first decade of market development, theorists have paid attention to the shortcomings of the market structure in the post-Soviet space. In the struggle to upgrade market organization in the CIS came the supporters of financial regulation of the market and moderate government intervention. The abrupt transition from the European to the American regulatory system was ineffective and led to stagnation in the economy and social development. Changing the direction of market reforms has been replaced by superficial and manipulative procedures. As a result, Ukraine lost the priority of early 2000s, according to the degree of institutional development. This period was marked by strengthening the power of big corporate sector, gaining them the status of institutional power, which claims to supremacy in the national market structure. National markets gained an expressed oligopoly form. This is how national institutional trap appeared. It is possible to neutralize it with institutional instruments: elimination of political confrontation, overcoming the conflict of interests, the role of public administration development, awareness of the priority of public-social needs over the marginalist interpretation of evolution. |
| URI: | http://ea.donntu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/27990 |
| Располагается в коллекциях: | Випуск 2(44)
|
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.
|
