|
|
eaDonNTU, Donetsk >
Научные труды ДонНТУ >
Серия: Экономическая >
Випуск 1(43) >
Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://ea.donntu.ru/handle/123456789/27936
|
| Название: | Интернализованный политический ресурс в современной экономике России: количественная оценка для регионального крупного бизнеса |
| Другие названия: | Інтерналізований та політичний ресурс в сучасній економіці Росії: кількісна оцінка для регіонального великого бізнесу
INTERNALIZED POLITICAL RESOURCE IN MODERN RUSSIAN ECONOMY: A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF REGIONAL LARGE BUSINESS |
| Авторы: | Кислицын, Д.В.
Кісліцин, Д.В.
KISLITSYN, D.V. |
| Ключевые слова: | internalized political resource
proximity to power
интернализованный политический ресурс
близость к власти
інтерналізований політичний ресурс
близькість до влади |
| Дата публикации: | 2013 |
| Издатель: | ДонНТУ |
| Библиографическое описание: | Наукові праці Донецького національного технічного університету. Серія: економічна. Випуск 1(43) - Донецьк, ДонНТУ, 2013. |
| Аннотация: | Целью статьи является разработка методики оценки политического ресурса, накопленного российским крупным региональным бизнесом. В основе методики лежит анализ советов директоров, которые рассматриваются как «статусный орган», который включает в свой состав доминирующих собственников компании и аффилированных с ними лиц, при этом интенсивность политических связей компании с властью предлагается оценивать через политический статус членов совета директоров данной компании. |
| Описание: | The purpose of this paper is to develop methodology for assessing the political resources of Russian large regional business. The methodology is an analysis of the boards of directors that are considered "status body", which includes in its membership the majority owners of the company and entities affiliated with them, and the intensity of the political relations of the company with the authority is proposed to be evaluated by the political status of the members of the company's boardof directors.
Communication between the government and business, as well as the benefits that the individual firms gain from their special relationship with the government, have always attracted the attention of researchers. It is proposed to use the term "political resource" by which we understand, in the most general and abstract form, the ability to make transfers of other resources through policy (based on the relationship of subordination) mechanisms. Within political science this phenomenon was described by R. Dahl in his "Modern political analysis", where he called it a "cumulative inequality" - an asymmetric situation in which control over one of resources leads to the control over other types of resources.
Analysis of the literature suggests that the political life is important - it provides firms with privileged access to other resources, particularly to capital, both to bank financing and to equity (market values of politically influential firms more expensive). This influence can be measured quantitatively. The mechanism through which firms benefit from the use of diverse political resources: tax privileges, investment credits, official delays in the payment of taxes, the transfer of state property.
The principal difficulty that arises before the researchers' politically influential firms "is to determine what kinds of firms have political resource, or otherwise formulating the question, which is an indicator of political influence. Selection criteria of «political influence» are a non- trivial research problem, which is solved in different ways by different researchers. Thus it is important that the political resources of what kind of business we evaluate. In this article, we aim to create a model for evaluating the Russian regional political resources of large business. In contrast to the small and medium business, large business, we can offer a number of formal criteria of its holdings of internalized political resource. Selected private figures represent one side of an objective role in the regional economy, and on the other - the political status of its owners and managers. At the heart of the study is the analysis of the boards of directors of these companies, but we believe a number of assumptions that allow the development of a methodology that is optimal for evaluating Russian political life is major regional business represented typically by non-public companies. |
| URI: | http://ea.donntu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/27936 |
| Располагается в коллекциях: | Випуск 1(43)
|
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.
|
